MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 25 '24 at 17:49
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 273
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 848
84% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,055
65% 1,055 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
Nvidia(10DE 14B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
157% Outstanding
Lighting 230
Reflection 207
Parallax 192
188% 210 fps
MRender 245
Gravity 156
Splatting 128
138% 176 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 157%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
314GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1796 1629 1618 1637 1640 1639 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,605
Write 2,516
Mixed 1,966
SusWrite 1,660
491% 2,187 MB/s
4K Read 68.4
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 93.1
320% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,316
DQ Write 1,064
DQ Mixed 1,156
875% 1,179 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 357%
Great: 410%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 360 360 353 356 363 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 362
Write 358
Mixed 366
SusWrite 358
82% 361 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 55.1
181% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 379
DQ Mixed 630
405% 466 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 110%
Great: 310%
USB30 320GB
140GB free
Firmware: 0405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 32 32 33 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 39.2
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 32.2
26% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 45%
USB3.0 high speed 1TB
382GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 21.1
Mixed 19.7
45% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
15% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT8G4D30AET4K.M8FE1 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 BLT8G4D30AET4K.M8FE1 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 35.1
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 35.8
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 27" 1280 720 ACR06CF VG270U P
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,521 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $683
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback