TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator PH517-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH517-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Cayman_CFS
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '24 at 16:49
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 228
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 648
68% 544 Pts
64-Core 776
48% 776 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 87.3%
 Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1243) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.5% Very good
Lighting 88.1
Reflection 119
Parallax 93.2
72% 100 fps
MRender 90.6
Gravity 95.3
Splatting 103
80% 96.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 74.5%
 Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256GD9MNE-6200A 256GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40000E00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 527 363 345 330 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,166
Write 411
Mixed 566
SusWrite 382
139% 631 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 44.1
153% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 716
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 511
388% 532 MB/s
Poor: 135% ↑
This bench: 141%
 Great: 225%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
790GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 112 112 112 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 111
73% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
161% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 61.8%
 Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 23
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 25.3
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 80.7%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 0P 5R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 12% 106 214 56 144 17.2" 1280 720 AUO319D
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Predator PH517-51 Builds (Compare 586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Acer Predator PH517-51

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples429x
Core i9-8950HKIntelBench 74%, 14,729 samples153x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples4x
GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples583x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples3x
SSD
HFS256GD9MNE-6200A 256GBBench 190%, 1,347 samples51x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $103Bench 310%, 455,997 samples40x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples39x
RAM
ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 6,230 samples130x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples110x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples60x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback