Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '24 at 03:35
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	KAZ-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 110 2-Core 218 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 412 54% 408 Pts	64-Core 416 26% 416 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3510) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.76 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.7% Poor	Lighting 34.5 Reflection 46.1 Parallax 33.2 28% 37.9 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 37.3 Splatting 26.4 27% 34 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 256G 256GB 2,993 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN11842 SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 420 428 423 430 430 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Read 440 Write 430 Mixed 409 SusWrite 409 95% 422 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 35.8 131% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 230 173% 227 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 103%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 3,439 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 491GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 177 175 175 175 179 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Read 116 Write 113 Mixed 78.7 SusWrite 175 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0 115% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown D12.2324WE.001 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75.5% Very good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 30.3 MC Mixed 22.8 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 21.7 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	45	10	60	23.8"	1920 1027	HPN3431 HP 24w

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2V 2.0 Builds (Compare 646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	226x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	205x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	37x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	61x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	48x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	36x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	26x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	23x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	11x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $320

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16