Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141028
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '24 at 02:23
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 71.1 2-Core 142 59% 97.9 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 409 42% 340 Pts	64-Core 406 25% 406 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.1% Above average	Lighting 63.8 Reflection 58.1 Parallax 96 52% 72.6 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 73.4 Splatting 47.3 49% 61.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 252GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 374 368 381 376 417 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 316 Mixed 430 SusWrite 369 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 70.5 4K Mixed 48.4 154% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 211 166% 232 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 130%
INTENSO 256GB 4,055 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 237GB free Firmware: V0609A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 400 407 401 409 407 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 407 Mixed 425 SusWrite 405 97% 433 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 30.2 127% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 58.4 93% 178 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 478 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 18.5 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 12.7 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	39	5	60	23.8"	1280 720	SAM71DA LS24AG32x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-970A-UD3P Builds (Compare 818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P - $300

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	230x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	224x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	47x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	46x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	39x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	27x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	43x
BLS4G3D1609DS 2x4GBCrucialBench 43%, 4,102 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $645

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16