HP EliteBook 745 G6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 745 G6  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8584
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '24 at 02:16
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Memory 6.67
1-Core 11.4
2-Core 21.5
7% 13.2 Pts
4-Core 34.1
8-Core 53.9
5% 44 Pts
64-Core 56.6
4% 56.6 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics
HP(103C 8584) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.41% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 4.4
2% 3.37 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.41%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 388 387 370 383 384 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 639
Write 541
Mixed 563
SusWrite 397
120% 535 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 12.2
39% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 83.8
DQ Write 55.4
DQ Mixed 61.5
48% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 197%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
20.2% Poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 10.4
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.5
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 445
9% 445 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 52 60 14" 1280 720 BOE0868
Typical EliteBook 745 G6 Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 745 G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback