HP EliteBook 745 G6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 745 G6  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8584
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '24 at 02:02
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43% Average
Memory 43.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 210
64% 122 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 494
42% 362 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics
HP(103C 8584) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 21
11% 15 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 9.3
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 454 417 416 415 415 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,180
Write 1,084
Mixed 943
SusWrite 436
204% 911 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 46.9
163% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 595
444% 593 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 150%
Great: 197%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 18
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 14" 1280 720 BOE0868
Typical EliteBook 745 G6 Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 745 G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback