XUM B75

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemXUM B75  (all builds)
MotherboardXUM B75
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210301
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 24 '24 at 16:01
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 95
2-Core 173
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 465
37% 325 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$291
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 116
Parallax 150
133% 143 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 129
Splatting 105
113% 143 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 121%
Great: 127%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Intel(8086 2111) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HX256GSSDM2-PCIE 256GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 446 188 261 92 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 1,091
Write 643
Mixed 673
SusWrite 210
145% 654 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 18.8
109% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 326
259% 361 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 105%
Great: 165%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
77GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 144 147 149 149 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 139
Write 63.6
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 147
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DX8GDDR3U1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 2R 0G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 25% 32 185 12 60 27" 1920 1017 AOC2702 27G2WG3-
Typical B75 Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: XUM B75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $452
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback