HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 24 '24 at 12:20
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 178
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 340
46% 341 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Device(1816 BD14) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 20.6
12% 20.5 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 20
17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 106 47 96 22 102 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48% Average
Read 222
Write 222
Mixed 222
SusWrite 97.9
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 18.6
82% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 42.4
73% 143 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48%
Great: 100%
S900-240 240GB
51GB free
Firmware: HCS1A25E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 342 213 87 108 0.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 464
Write 376
Mixed 345
SusWrite 187
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 10.5
78% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 14.4
72% 158 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
180GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 80 85 86 84 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 84.9
Write 85.7
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 84.1
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 58%
Jmicron Tech 1TB
51GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 6.8 7 7 6.9 7.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1.7
Write 3
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 7.1
2% 3.32 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Mixed 0
50% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 76%
WD Elements 2621 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6 5.9 5.9 6 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.59% Terrible
Read 49.9
Write 6.7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 5.9
16% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 8.59%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 28 60 27" 1280 720 HPN3494 HP 27w
Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback