Dell Latitude E5530 non-vPro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E5530 non-vPro  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05GRXT
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '20 at 15:18
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 153
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 237
32% 237 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 053D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.03% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.92
Parallax 3.16
4% 4.52 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8.3
5% 5.54 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.03%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S900-240 240GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 408 412 412 394 399 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 472
Write 400
Mixed 388
SusWrite 404
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 24.3
103% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 39
84% 165 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TSB1600D3S1ELD/4GE Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E5530 non-vPro Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E5530 non-vPro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 6% - Terrible Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback