Valve Jupiter

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Valve Jupiter (all builds)
Motherboard	Valve Jupiter
Memory	7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20231201
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '24 at 08:27
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Custom APU 0405 841 User benchmarks, average bench 57% FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Memory 48.2 1-Core 92.4 2-Core 180 57% 107 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 383 43% 336 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 670 Graphics 5 User benchmarks, average bench 15% AMD(1002 0123) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 23.30.01.03 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 25.6 Parallax 32.8 15% 25.7 fps	MRender 20.6 Gravity 20.9 Splatting 17.9 16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 1TB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 283% 677GB free (System drive) Firmware: 73116000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1660 1748 1653 1928 1965 1885 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	265% Outstanding	Read 1901 Write 1,746 Mixed 1,687 SusWrite 1,807 402% 1,785 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 69.8 4K Mixed 40.9 148% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 841 DQ Write 645 DQ Mixed 820 592% 769 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 265% Great: 541%
SDXC 513GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 430GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 77 80 80 81 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GB 1,348 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB 23h 4266 MHz clocked @ 5500 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	66.9% Good	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 29.2 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 19.4 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 143%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	39	5	60	36.7"	1280 720	XMI3446 Mi Monitor

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Jupiter Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

System: Valve Jupiter

CPU
Custom APU 0405AMDBench 57%, 841 samples	48x

GPU
Custom GPU 0405AMDBench 17%, 322 samples	46x
RX 6500-XTAMD $140Bench 50%, 2,413 samples	1x
Radeon RX 670 GraphicsAMDBench 15%, 5 samples	1x

SSD
OM3PDP3512B-A01 512GBKingstonBench 142%, 63 samples	7x
64GB 62GBE2m2Bench 403%, 4 samples	4x
ESMP512GKB4C3-E13TS 512GBPhisonBench 152%, 29 samples	3x

RAM
K3LK7K70BM-BGCP000 4x4GBUnknownBench 68%, 549 samples	33x
MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GBUnknownBench 102%, 1,348 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16