Microsoft Surface Pro X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro X  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro X
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2880 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230512
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '23 at 14:24
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Microsoft SQ1
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 48.4
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 90.7
37% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 175
20% 157 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 1TB
792GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 1,072
Write 20.1
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 17
60% 287 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.4
92% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 541%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNCRMALPR-NEE 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2096 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
63.5% Good
MC Read 17
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 23.7
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback