Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512DA
Memory	13.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190716
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '24 at 04:37
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	ECU-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U 21,522 User benchmarks, average bench 41% FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Memory 52.3 1-Core 40.4 2-Core 148 43% 80.4 Pts	4-Core 4.7 8-Core 83.7 4% 44.2 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics 27,821 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1821) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.44.13 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	1.96% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 1.5 2% 2 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2.1 2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.96% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW512H6 512GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 426GB free (System drive) Firmware: LBF010C SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 140 113 132 96 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	51% Above average	Read 399 Write 269 Mixed 296 SusWrite 127 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 32 4K Mixed 19.1 65% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 172 124% 162 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 86%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 923GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 108 105 108 106 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 176 Write 33.5 Mixed 41 SusWrite 107 65% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 253% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC CT16G4SFD8266.M16FE 20GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2400, 2667 MHz 4096, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.3% Poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 13 21% 7.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 157 25% 157 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	53	23	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15F5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA Builds (Compare 327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_F512DA

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	158x
Ryzen 7 3700UAMDBench 49%, 23,686 samples	96x
Ryzen 3 3200UAMDBench 41%, 21,522 samples	73x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	158x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	96x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	73x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	85x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GBKingstonBench 97%, 7,536 samples	59x
SD9SN8W128G1102 128GBSandiskBench 67%, 2,914 samples	39x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBSamsungBench 55%, 2,394 samples	48x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBHynixBench 56%, 2,591 samples	32x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16