Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-N305 282 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Memory 31.4 1-Core 58.8 2-Core 159 42% 83.1 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 575 55% 453 Pts	64-Core 614 38% 614 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 622 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Acer(1025 1656) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	6.74% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 11 Parallax 8.9 6% 9.13 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 10.3 Splatting 8.6 8% 9.87 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.74% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4256Q-AA 256GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBI01108 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,412 Write 845 Mixed 818 226% 1,025 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 23 105% 36.4 MB/s	DQ Read 413 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 418 284% 352 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 189%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 4x2GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.2% Good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 27.7 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 10.6 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 229 18% 229 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	37	9	60	15.5"	1536 793	AUOE997

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 6%, 622 samples	63x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,359 samples	4x

SSD
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA256TFK 256GBBench 158%, 336 samples	25x
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GBBench 203%, 4,667 samples	24x
OM8SEP4256Q-AA 256GBKingstonBench 149%, 20 samples	10x

RAM
H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 4x2GBHynixBench 70%, 83 samples	38x
MT62F1G32D4DR-031 4x2GBMicronBench 68%, 149 samples	11x
K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 4x2GBSamsungBench 58%, 138 samples	10x