Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 WiFi ax

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 239%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive546% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 WiFi ax  (all builds)
Memory118.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '24 at 19:20
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 73.7
1-Core 180
2-Core 350
105% 201 Pts
4-Core 679
8-Core 1,340
119% 1,009 Pts
64-Core 2,256
140% 2,256 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 100%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Lighting 310
Reflection 273
Parallax 315
252% 299 fps
MRender 335
Gravity 256
Splatting 185
203% 259 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 209%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$146
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620331WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2788 4303 4084 2858 2565 2559 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
546% Outstanding
Read 4,499
Write 4,876
Mixed 3,439
SusWrite 3,193
900% 4,002 MB/s
4K Read 75.9
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 95.2
347% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,654
DQ Write 1,249
DQ Mixed 1418
1,069% 1,440 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 546%
Great: 685%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 188
Write 170
Mixed 106
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 1.2
25% 8.27 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 1.5
3% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 39%
ST12000NM001G-2MV103 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: SN04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 253
Write 248
Mixed 121
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 1.1
65% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 5.1
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 0.7
3% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 44%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
335GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,210
Write 4000
Mixed 2947
828% 3,719 MB/s
4K Read 73.5
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 91.6
324% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,758
DQ Write 1472
DQ Mixed 1,479
1,145% 1,570 MB/s
Poor: 249% Great: 623%
Seagate Expansion HDD 14TB
6TB free
Firmware: 0003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 222
Write 215
Mixed 156
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 0.1
44% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.2
DQ Write 19.1
DQ Mixed 0.5
3% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 40%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
899GB free
Firmware: 2BA30003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 55.6
Write 40.5
Mixed 37.4
33% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
114GB free
Firmware: AX001U
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 95.3
Write 100
Mixed 34.2
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK128GX4M4A2666C16 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 79.7
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 28.3
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 27
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 115%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 HPN354A HP 27fh
Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 WiFi ax Builds (Compare 443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 199%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 WiFi ax

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback