Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive384% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory86.3 GB free of 96 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220330
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 10:59
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 91%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$270
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 78.3
1-Core 204
2-Core 397
117% 226 Pts
4-Core 812
8-Core 1,543
140% 1,178 Pts
64-Core 2,914
180% 2,914 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.96
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 278
Reflection 259
Parallax 286
226% 274 fps
Gravity 232
Splatting 177
177% 204 fps
Poor: 163% Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1433 1435 1433 1422 1417 1411 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
384% Outstanding
Read 2,600
Write 2,489
Mixed 1,847
SusWrite 1,425
469% 2,090 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 225
4K Mixed 105
361% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 2047
DQ Write 1,612
DQ Mixed 1,755
1,334% 1,805 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 384%
Great: 435%
Seagate Expansion HDD 14TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1801
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 43 43 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 41
Write 37.6
Mixed 34
SusWrite 42.1
9% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 1.6
21% 6.5 MB/s
DQ Read 2.7
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 1.4
2% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 40%
Seagate ST12000VN0008-2JH101 12TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 226 226 228 227 226 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 94 100 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 72.2
Write 90.1
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 94.5
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
162% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 CMK32GX5M2B5200C40 CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 CMK32GX5M2B5200C40 95GB
4800, 4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
32767, 16384, 32767, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
159% Outstanding
MC Read 61.3
MC Write 62.3
MC Mixed 60.1
175% 61.2 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 50
SC Mixed 34.6
102% 35.9 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 135%
This bench: 159%
Great: 168%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 5,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,035
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback