Asus GL753VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL753VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL753VD
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMar 20 '24 at 15:28
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 53.3
1-Core 33.4
2-Core 74.1
34% 53.6 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 268
28% 224 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1590) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2127
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 4.3
5% 4.23 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 6.9
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 299 382 290 349 371 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 1,021
Write 772
Mixed 524
SusWrite 359
149% 669 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 25.8
82% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 308
242% 335 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 104%
Great: 442%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
70GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 58 94 78 74 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 79.8
Write 100
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 79
57% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
119% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 71%
WD Elements 500GB
195GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 79 73 79 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 53.7
Write 55
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 75.9
76% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA266.M16FRS 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24.5% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 49 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN36AC HP V24i
Typical GL753VD Builds (Compare 1,266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL753VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback