Asus PRIME H410M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H410M-E  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime23.5 Days
Run DateMar 20 '24 at 08:43
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$58
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 210
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 617
61% 500 Pts
64-Core 670
42% 670 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 2188) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44% Average
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 57.1
Parallax 53.2
45% 55.1 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 45.2
42% 53 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata 128GB
3GB free
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 30 22 25 16 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 81%
WL750GSA6472B 750GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 45.C8F.A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 29 45 40 45 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 91.7
Write 82.2
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 43.2
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0
52% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE Corsair CMV4GX4M1A2133C15 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.1
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 10 75 23.8" 1920 1017 PHLC212 PHL 241V8
Typical PRIME H410M-E Builds (Compare 4,599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H410M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback