Asrock B550M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B550M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 22:31
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 98.9
1-Core 163
2-Core 330
107% 197 Pts
4-Core 648
8-Core 1,191
110% 920 Pts
64-Core 1,500
93% 1,500 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
196% Outstanding
Lighting 281
Reflection 260
Parallax 312
229% 285 fps
MRender 353
Gravity 236
Splatting 185
203% 258 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 196%
Great: 205%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$122
650GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,703
Write 3,659
Mixed 3,115
641% 2,826 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 79.2
255% 86.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,308
DQ Write 752
DQ Mixed 1,137
818% 1,066 MB/s
Poor: 278% Great: 521%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF4600C19D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 50.1
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 42.1
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 45.7
99% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 57
70% 57 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 111%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 0P 5R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 30% 37 526 459 165 27" 2560 1369 AOC2703 Q27G3G3R3
Typical B550M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 1,097 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B550M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 122% - Outstanding Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback