TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN515-57

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-57  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Scala_TLS
Memory16 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220602
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 16:28
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 58.2
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 180
61% 111 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 507
52% 422 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 60.4%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1539) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4953
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 3.5
4% 6.33 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 7.2
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 4.95%
 Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,543
Write 1,407
Mixed 1,386
322% 1,445 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 66.4
220% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 584
DQ Write 476
DQ Mixed 514
389% 525 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 242%
Geil Z3_1TB 1TB
50GB free
Firmware: U0506A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 400 403 404 408 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 446
Write 395
Mixed 384
SusWrite 362
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 22.1
98% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 40.7
81% 158 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 78.9%
 Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FR 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 15.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 12.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 50.3%
 Great: 98%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 14 144 15.5" 1920 1009 CMN1521
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro AN515-57 Builds (Compare 15,195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

CPU
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples9,387x
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples5,227x
Core i9-11900HIntelBench 89%, 6,494 samples568x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples5,211x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples3,044x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples1,830x
SSD
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GBNvmeBench 186%, 8,325 samples4,159x
HFM512GD3JX016N 512GBNvmeBench 244%, 4,593 samples3,789x
KINGSTON OM8PDP3256B-AA1 256GBNvmeBench 158%, 2,168 samples1,214x
RAM
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples2,922x
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 14,450 samples2,208x
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 46%, 7,758 samples831x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback