Asrock A320M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1840 x 1150 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 15:13
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 593
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 804
50% 804 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$253
Zotac(19DA 2630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.3% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 112
Parallax 113
105% 118 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 90
Splatting 85.3
83% 104 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac Mobiledatastar 250GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 103 77 25 91 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 489
Write 423
Mixed 385
SusWrite 114
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 29.1
136% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 0.7
50% 118 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 73%
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
28GB free
Firmware: UG400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 91 59 32 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 447
Write 382
Mixed 200
SusWrite 87.2
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 3.1
45% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 30.1
38% 69.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 60%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
48GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 126 123 130 107 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 476
Mixed 412
SusWrite 157
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 51.8
172% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 360
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99%
Great: 124%
Patriot P210 512GB
1GB free
Firmware: SN11002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 365
Write 351
Mixed 332
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 37.8
133% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 199
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 99%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
225GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 139 149 140 141 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 143
Write 132
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 141
78% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 35.4
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 28
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 22" 1280 720 ACI22B1 MW221
Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $256
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback