Asus K31CD-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus K31CD-K  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K31CD-K
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 13:10
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 224
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 564
64% 500 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.9
Reflection 40.4
Parallax 0.2
29% 25.5 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 26
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATA III 960GB
623GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0110A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 0.1 0.4 0.3 1.5 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.6% Average
Read 32.1
Write 61.6
Mixed 87
SusWrite 30.1
12% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 25.9
108% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 43.5
84% 163 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 101%
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
97GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 162 171 172 172 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 488
Write 470
Mixed 366
SusWrite 181
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 30.9
111% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 187
182% 289 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 93%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 113 112 113 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 126
Write 122
Mixed 103
SusWrite 111
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 859B CT8G4DFS824A.C8FP 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.5% Above average
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 0
MC Mixed 22
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 23.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 23.8" 1280 720 AUS2421 ASUS VG249
Typical K31CD-K Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K31CD-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback