Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	61.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '18 at 16:38
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 53.3 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 173 57% 104 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 636 52% 456 Pts	64-Core 1,624 100% 1,624 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Palit(1569 1184) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Lighting 43.6 Reflection 39.5 Parallax 52.2 36% 45.1 fps	MRender 53.1 Gravity 50.5 Splatting 37.3 38% 47 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3578 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 873 (B1) Unknown 98 98 25 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 56 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 31 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20174982025	49.3% Average	Read 259 Write 201 Mixed 210 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 20.1 4K Mixed 20.6 62% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 78.1 80% 132 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 33GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2492 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 660 (B1) Unknown 98 98 39 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 56 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 12 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19102828045	49.3% Average	Read 263 Write 201 Mixed 207 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 17.7 4K Mixed 19.1 59% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 83.2 88% 146 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 134%
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160 11,787 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 27GB free Firmware: R211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2957739 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 115397181324488 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3008 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 155 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 27 46 55837589531 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2957739 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2957739 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2957739 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 21751 (EA) Unknown 0 0 18137 (F1) Unknown 0 0 18137 (F2) Unknown 0 0 19261	41.2% Average	Read 256 Write 132 Mixed 187 42% 192 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 13.8 54% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 42.2 59% 109 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 81%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2205 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 656 (B1) Unknown 98 98 23 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 58 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 30 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11148044540	49% Average	Read 260 Write 201 Mixed 209 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 20.6 60% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 69.6 77% 132 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 8x8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	MC Read 51.8 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 36.6 116% 40.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.2 23% 7.97 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $349

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16