Asrock B450M/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 175%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B450M/ac  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240119
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 07:12
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 85.4
1-Core 176
2-Core 350
108% 204 Pts
4-Core 669
8-Core 1,276
116% 972 Pts
64-Core 2069
128% 2069 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 192
Parallax 211
172% 205 fps
MRender 290
Gravity 166
Splatting 124
150% 193 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 151%
Great: 157%
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
PNY(196E 1404) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 116
Parallax 155
128% 143 fps
MRender 217
Gravity 133
Splatting 108
119% 153 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 291 265 246 247 238 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 477
Mixed 425
SusWrite 291
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 34.8
115% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 364
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 109%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
260GB free
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2403 2390 2212 630 420 426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,422
Write 2,508
Mixed 2,203
SusWrite 1,414
481% 2,137 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 67.2
225% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,599
DQ Write 1,334
DQ Mixed 1,490
1,110% 1,475 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 318%
Great: 623%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
904GB free
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 106 105 106 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 98.4
Write 103
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 105
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 F4-3200C16-8GVKB CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 F4-3200C16-8GVKB 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 48.7
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 37.2
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.9
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 36.9
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 100 34.1" 1280 720 SAM730E S34CG50
Typical B450M/ac Builds (Compare 1,939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback