MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 223%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C94
MotherboardMSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)  (all builds)
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '24 at 06:46
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$250
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 83.9
1-Core 154
2-Core 310
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,222
109% 920 Pts
64-Core 2,133
132% 2,133 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
202% Outstanding
Lighting 306
Reflection 246
Parallax 286
250% 279 fps
MRender 328
Gravity 221
Splatting 157
183% 235 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 202%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-ASM2NE6500GTTD 500GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 672 477 357 376 161 316 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 2,041
Write 2,379
Mixed 1,861
SusWrite 393
374% 1,668 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 71.1
232% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,197
DQ Write 764
DQ Mixed 667
582% 876 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 222%
Great: 391%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
268GB free
Firmware: VD0R3A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 445 443 439 437 435 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 433
Mixed 379
SusWrite 439
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 37.6
136% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 240
177% 228 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 101%
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
297GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 405 105 108 105 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 114
Mixed 364
SusWrite 208
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 40.9
154% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 230
200% 294 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
47GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 59 60 61 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 53.4
Write 46.6
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 61.1
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
322GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 72 72 72 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 90.2
Write 90
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 70.9
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/16GX KF3200C16D4/16GX KHX3200C16D4/16GX KF3200C16D4/16GX 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 58.3
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 39.8
130% 45.7 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 39.2
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 122%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 47: 0P 5R 6G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 10% 63 217 58 60 24" 1280 720 SAC2442 DP
History: Score 10: 0P 0R 2G 4B | Score 47: 0P 5R 6G 4B
Typical MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94) Builds (Compare 2,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback