Razer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA760
Memory54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '24 at 17:06
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 193
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 584
56% 460 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 3003) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.8% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 8.4
5% 7.87 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.4
8% 9.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.8%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 3003) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 121
Parallax 113
97% 118 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 96.8
Splatting 85.6
85% 107 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,622
Write 1,568
Mixed 1,444
345% 1,545 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 59.8
188% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 648
DQ Write 497
DQ Mixed 566
425% 570 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MRA4S266GHHF32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.2% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 22
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 25.2
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 33 60 17.3" 1280 720 AUOE295
Typical Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2021) - RZ09-0368

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback