Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150625
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '18 at 15:11
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$25 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 96 1-Core 114 2-Core 219 83% 143 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 600 63% 505 Pts	64-Core 603 37% 603 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12.2 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.6% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 92.7 Parallax 159 87% 119 fps	MRender 89.1 Gravity 108 Splatting 130 92% 109 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10193 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3481 (B1) Unknown 98 98 73 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 60 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 418 (F1) Unknown 99 99 26365380038	123% Outstanding	Read 530 Write 491 Mixed 509 114% 510 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 49.5 185% 69.5 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 175 174% 280 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 124%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 119GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 15865 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 5885 (B1) Unknown 89 89 374 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 57 24 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 651 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14670208324	71.1% Very good	Read 508 Write 227 Mixed 354 80% 363 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 65.3 4K Mixed 19.7 97% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 69.2 DQ Mixed 61.5 76% 142 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 76%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 108GB free Firmware: 525ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5119001 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 39333310511771 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5535 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 662 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 23 75 42954588183 (C2) HDA temperature 23 75 42954588183 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5119001 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5119001 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5119001 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3971 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4355 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4355 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3176	85.3% Excellent	Read 521 Write 227 Mixed 219 70% 322 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 20.9 135% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 72.8 104% 195 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 85%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$88 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 573GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 137 132 4150 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6807 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7274 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3725 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 535 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 17676 (C2) HDA temperature 119 106 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	71.6% Very good	Read 132 Write 118 Mixed 123 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.25 89% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	71.4% Very good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 22.8 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 22.4 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 54 74% 54 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,621x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	446x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	223x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	405x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	229x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	156x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	109x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	105x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	91x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $925

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16