MSI PRO B650M-A WIFI (MS-7D77)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D77
MotherboardMSI PRO B650M-A WIFI (MS-7D77)  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '24 at 00:14
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 190
2-Core 327
107% 199 Pts
4-Core 675
8-Core 985
104% 830 Pts
64-Core 1,393
86% 1,393 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$361
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 204
Reflection 192
Parallax 230
166% 208 fps
MRender 292
Gravity 166
Splatting 125
151% 194 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 149%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ZP500GV30012 500GB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SUFSM002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3491 3272 195 148 137 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 1,860
Write 3,579
Mixed 2,180
SusWrite 1,231
502% 2,212 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 71.3
242% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 1,774
DQ Write 923
DQ Mixed 1,533
1,090% 1,410 MB/s
Poor: 169%
This bench: 285%
Great: 377%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF548C38-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
154% Outstanding
MC Read 56.9
MC Write 55.2
MC Mixed 53.8
158% 55.3 GB/s
SC Read 53.1
SC Write 55.7
SC Mixed 50.8
152% 53.2 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 154%
Great: 167%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 75 23.5" 1920 1017 DELD0F6 SE2417HGX
Typical PRO B650M-A WIFI (MS-7D77) Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 198%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO B650M-A WIFI (MS-7D77)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $746
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback