Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 190%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics212% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XII EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory50.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMar 16 '24 at 23:31
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 146
2-Core 289
93% 172 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 982
92% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,526
94% 1,526 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$866
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
212% Outstanding
Lighting 318
Reflection 288
Parallax 326
260% 311 fps
MRender 346
Gravity 247
Splatting 182
203% 258 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 212%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
175GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 368 405 399 374 374 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 470
Mixed 458
SusWrite 371
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 53.8
172% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1036 574 557 553 503 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,393
Write 2,267
Mixed 1,540
SusWrite 540
376% 1,685 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 71.7
241% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,089
DQ Write 755
DQ Mixed 917
686% 920 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 245%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
143GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 372 463 472 470 456 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 471
Mixed 450
SusWrite 423
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 52.1
174% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 354
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
95GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 317 194 195 192 192 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 463
Mixed 463
SusWrite 233
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 53.8
175% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 354
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 183 208 207 205 205 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 200
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 195
115% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 112%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.1% Very good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.1
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 22.7
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 0P 5R 6G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 55% 22 216 58 240 48.8" 5120 1377 SAM7053 LC49G95T
History: Score 26: 0P 1R 5G 6B | Score 51: 0P 5R 6G 8B
Typical ROG MAXIMUS XII EXTREME Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,389
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback