Lenovo 82MD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82MD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221116
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 16 '24 at 20:40
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
64% Good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 121
2-Core 205
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 392
44% 347 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 20.8
15% 21 fps
MRender 19.6
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 1.2
11% 15.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SSSTC CL1-4D256 256GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BS262 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 167 435 400 761 1029 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 3,145
Write 24.7
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 492
194% 919 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 15.2
136% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 485
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 363
261% 344 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 209%
Great: 156%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AL1P32NC4U1-B8BS Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 16.5
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 9.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 88 10 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE08D5
Typical 82MD Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback