Intel X99

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display640 x 480 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1053 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '24 at 16:39
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 159
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 634
54% 467 Pts
64-Core 2,123
131% 2,123 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful CN700 512GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H230610a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1829 1822 1838 1139 641 617 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,914
Write 1,857
Mixed 1,612
SusWrite 1,314
376% 1,674 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 44.2
142% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 653
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 542
389% 507 MB/s
Poor: 282%
This bench: 223%
Great: 411%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
18GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3,402
Mixed 2.5
1,121% 1,702 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Mixed 0
330% 29.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6D1 Hynix HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK 63GB
2667, 2667 MHz
32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.1% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 25.4
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 32 0" 1280 720
Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback