Acer Aspire A515-45

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-45  (all builds)
MotherboardLN Calla_LC
Memory13.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231024
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '24 at 01:03
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 68.2
1-Core 139
2-Core 274
85% 160 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 473
62% 464 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 152B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 24.2
9% 19.1 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 20.8
14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
639GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1232 1367 1393 1608 1593 214 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,855
Write 1,630
Mixed 1,370
SusWrite 1,234
342% 1,522 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 33
133% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 668
DQ Write 612
DQ Mixed 581
452% 620 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 218%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Adata 4JQA-0622AC 20GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 11.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 1R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 16% 25 122 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUODF87
Typical Aspire A515-45 Builds (Compare 764 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-45

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback