Acer Aspire ES1-572

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire ES1-572  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer T-Rex_SK
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime29 Days
Run DateMar 15 '24 at 00:31
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 95.3
47% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 140
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1085) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 4.6
3% 4 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 0.3
2% 3.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 250GB 250GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3414B8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 293 298 277 316 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 386
Write 343
Mixed 299
SusWrite 270
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 3.5
62% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 5.6
34% 79 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMS4TDC3C0K0446SCG 079E TMA851S6AFR6N-UHSC 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15DC
Typical Aspire ES1-572 Builds (Compare 690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ES1-572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback