Peladn HA-4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive458% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemPeladn HA-4  (all builds)
MotherboardPELADN HA-4
Memory19.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231127
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '24 at 00:29
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 64.4
1-Core 194
2-Core 381
109% 213 Pts
4-Core 725
8-Core 1,271
121% 998 Pts
64-Core 1,481
92% 1,481 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
AMD(1002 0124) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.2% Average
Lighting 48.8
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 77.8
40% 50.2 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 61.1
Splatting 86.3
50% 56.8 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fikwot FN950 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN14081
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3460 3493 3572 2485 2194 2438 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
458% Outstanding
Read 3,655
Write 3,802
Mixed 2,667
SusWrite 2,940
735% 3,266 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 75.5
252% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,456
DQ Write 983
DQ Mixed 1,128
867% 1,189 MB/s
Poor: 245%
This bench: 458%
Great: 560%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G56C46S5.C8D 32GB
5600, 5600 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
116% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 44.6
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 30.7
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 35.4
102% 35.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 116%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 36.1" 1280 720 TCL0000 43S451
Typical HA-4 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Peladn HA-4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback