Samsung 750QGK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 750QGK  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP750QGK-KG1FR
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240131
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 14 '24 at 18:19
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core 7 150U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 40.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 279
74% 150 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 671
64% 529 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics
Sanyo(144D C894) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4953
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 25.9
18% 25.4 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 20.8
21% 26.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00B 512GB
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC7AK1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,456
Write 1,287
Mixed 1,285
299% 1,343 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 70.5
236% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,026
DQ Write 669
DQ Mixed 628
528% 774 MB/s
Poor: 184% Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
143% Outstanding
MC Read 48.9
MC Write 73.9
MC Mixed 52.5
167% 58.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 21.7
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 143%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 19% 21 102 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4159
Typical 750QGK Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 750QGK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback