Alienware Aurora R15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics374% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware Aurora R15  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 049PDM
Memory51.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 14 '24 at 16:52
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900KF-$489
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 73.4
1-Core 216
2-Core 439
123% 243 Pts
4-Core 864
8-Core 1,609
148% 1,237 Pts
64-Core 3,692
228% 3,692 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,750
Dell(1028 5101) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.09
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
374% Outstanding
Lighting 590
Reflection 557
Parallax 681
481% 609 fps
MRender 524
Gravity 572
Splatting 306
366% 467 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 374%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KXG70PN84T09 KIOXIA 4096GB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10904106 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2320
Write 2,164
Mixed 1557
448% 2,014 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 49.2
167% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 878
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 756
518% 653 MB/s
Poor: 192% Great: 414%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 210
Write 152
Mixed 75.1
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.4
567% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown XF1R8M-HYM-A 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
144% Outstanding
MC Read 61.2
MC Write 55.1
MC Mixed 53.6
162% 56.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 29.5
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 144%
This bench: 144%
Great: 178%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 39 144 27" 2560 1369 RZR1401 RZ39-0276
Typical Aurora R15 Builds (Compare 856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 597%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback