Priminfo PRIMINFO2013A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPriminfo PRIMINFO2013A  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ77MK
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 14 '24 at 15:22
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 194
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 498
51% 412 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.8% Above average
Lighting 72.3
Reflection 76.3
Parallax 71.6
59% 73.4 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 59.9
53% 64.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 81 84 92 93 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 209
Write 124
Mixed 156
SusWrite 86.6
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 24.2
83% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 94
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 92.2
74% 103 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 73%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
126GB free
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 238 239 240 235 243 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.8% Above average
Read 222
Write 122
Mixed 210
SusWrite 238
45% 198 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 25.4
85% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 150
120% 167 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 102%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
443GB free
Firmware: SAI20103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 419 421 422 411 431 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 425
Mixed 410
SusWrite 421
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 28.6
106% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 136
153% 258 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
76GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 171 172 168 172 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 151
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 169
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 103%
Generic External 1TB
316GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 56.4
Write 22.6
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 27.1
38% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.1
70% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 1R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 42% 12 213 58 75 23.9" 1280 720 SAM707D LF24T35
Typical PRIMINFO2013A Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Priminfo PRIMINFO2013A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $356
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback