Thunderobot 911S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemThunderobot 911S  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT V150RNJS-HL
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '24 at 21:53
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 60.3
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 196
65% 119 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 662
62% 516 Pts
64-Core 834
52% 834 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 0159) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4889
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
9.04% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 17
Parallax 12.4
9% 13.5 fps
MRender 17.8
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 3.4
9% 12.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.04%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ymtc PC300-512GB-B 512GB
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: YM0500C6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2369 2413 2437 1218 622 621 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,554
Write 2,496
Mixed 1,587
SusWrite 1,613
463% 2,063 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 38.5
233% 93.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,161
DQ Write 1,016
DQ Mixed 688
625% 955 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 317%
Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 32.2
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 9.9
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 53 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0ACC
Typical 911S Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Thunderobot 911S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback