MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateMar 13 '24 at 14:32
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 139
2-Core 270
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 845
84% 688 Pts
64-Core 1043
65% 1043 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.3% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 140
Parallax 200
98% 153 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 136
Splatting 94.3
93% 116 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
318GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1867 1662 1664 1665 1659 1666 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
365% Outstanding
Read 2,640
Write 2,264
Mixed 1,976
SusWrite 1697
481% 2,144 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 97.9
329% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,329
DQ Write 1,070
DQ Mixed 1,167
882% 1,189 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 365%
Great: 410%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 655 541 602 411 496 527 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 1,314
Mixed 744
SusWrite 538
176% 774 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 60.6
212% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,175
DQ Write 902
DQ Mixed 527
533% 868 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 165%
Great: 310%
USB30 320GB
140GB free
Firmware: 0405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 31.3
Write 31.6
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 41.1
25% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 45%
USB3.0 high speed 1TB
359GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.1 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 402
Write 4
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4.2
72% 104 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT8G4D30AET4K.M8FE1 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 BLT8G4D30AET4K.M8FE1 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 34.5
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 35.3
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 27" 1280 720 ACR06CF VG270U P
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,521 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $683
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback