HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 Mobile Workstation PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 175%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 207%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ZBook Fury 16 G10 Mobile Workstation PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B92
Memory117 GB free of 128 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 13 '24 at 13:39
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13950HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 61.3
1-Core 187
2-Core 410
109% 219 Pts
4-Core 811
8-Core 1,294
129% 1,052 Pts
64-Core 2,852
176% 2,852 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 107%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
HP(103C 8B92) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5161
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
165% Outstanding
Lighting 217
Reflection 264
Parallax 236
177% 239 fps
MRender 321
Gravity 201
Splatting 193
189% 238 fps
Poor: 123%
This bench: 165%
Great: 204%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00BH7 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3TGXG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1958 2105 2151 2026 2038 2046 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,083
Write 2,003
Mixed 1,990
SusWrite 2,054
458% 2,032 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 80.1
258% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,095
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 765
551% 733 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 321%
Great: 500%
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00BH7 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: HPS3TGXG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2077 1987 1990 1963 1992 1967 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,773
Write 1,708
Mixed 1,860
SusWrite 1,996
414% 1,834 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 37.1
143% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 432
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 837
506% 542 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 254%
Great: 500%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CWMOL 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (82nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
116% Outstanding
MC Read 46.6
MC Write 46
MC Mixed 42.9
129% 45.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 24.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 27 60 16" 1280 720 BOE0A4F
Typical ZBook Fury 16 G10 Mobile Workstation PC Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 Mobile Workstation PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback