HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory19 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMar 12 '24 at 23:49
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 185
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 466
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 14.9
12% 13 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 15.8
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Suneast SE900 SSD 512GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08735
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.6 11 31 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 408
Write 105
Mixed 178
SusWrite 14.9
38% 176 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 28.4
97% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 89.4
87% 141 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 80%
Teclast 1TB SSD 1TB
810GB free
Firmware: HP2818E3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 412 312 294 315 264 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 324
Write 388
Mixed 335
SusWrite 329
78% 344 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 1
44% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 1
53% 127 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 259%
Teclast 1TB A850 1TB
740GB free
Firmware: SN06201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 424 399 394 327 294 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 22% Great: 68%
General UDisk 1TB
985GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.7 7.8 11 12 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.2% Very poor
Read 54.5
Write 12.7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 7.2
19% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
106% 9.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SE3D1600-8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 15.4
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 1R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 8% 48 143 53 75 34.1" 1280 720 GSM7770 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback