MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B17)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics217% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive298% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B17
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B17)  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '24 at 23:45
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 280
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 1,035
96% 799 Pts
64-Core 1,521
94% 1,521 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$595
Gigabyte(1458 413B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
217% Outstanding
Lighting 295
Reflection 331
Parallax 402
240% 343 fps
MRender 478
Gravity 280
Splatting 224
255% 327 fps
Poor: 173%
This bench: 217%
Great: 235%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1987 1890 1850 1855 1860 1833 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,262
Write 2,086
Mixed 2,078
SusWrite 1,879
468% 2,076 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 63.8
204% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 749
DQ Write 562
DQ Mixed 670
497% 661 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 298%
Great: 526%
Samsung 970 EVO 250GB
701GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2070 2151 1544 1526 1546 1541 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2,437
Write 2,209
Mixed 1,788
SusWrite 1,730
458% 2,041 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 67.3
216% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 807
DQ Write 491
DQ Mixed 704
510% 667 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 300%
Great: 382%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 137 135 128 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 102
Write 136
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 134
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 30.8
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 29.7
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 28.6" 1280 720 SAM7177 LS28AG700N
Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B17) Builds (Compare 8,740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B17) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $846
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback