PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B460 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200514 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 10 '24 at 12:55 |
Run Duration | 175 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
|
52.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 8717) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 54 42 17 49 MB/s
|
69.9%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST3500820AS 500GB
104GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 75 77 76 76 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$33
88GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 106 104 103 MB/s
|
49.1%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
63.9%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 36 | 16 | 240 | 24.5" | 1280 720 | AOCB322 25G3ZM |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 414x |
Core i5-10400Intel $125Bench 84%, 71,804 samples | 127x |
Core i7-10700Intel $232Bench 93%, 71,010 samples | 78x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 94x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 79x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 70x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $438 |