Peladn HA-4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive309% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemPeladn HA-4  (all builds)
MotherboardPELADN HA-4
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '24 at 23:47
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 72.2
1-Core 198
2-Core 387
113% 219 Pts
4-Core 757
8-Core 1,264
123% 1,011 Pts
64-Core 1,548
96% 1,548 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
AMD(1002 0124) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 47.7
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 65.5
39% 41.6 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 62.3
Splatting 88.2
48% 54.2 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PELADN 512GB
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERFM11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3863 1110 383 385 383 385 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 2,653
Write 4,012
Mixed 3,047
SusWrite 1,085
610% 2,699 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 79.1
258% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,669
DQ Write 849
DQ Mixed 1,429
1,016% 1,316 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 309%
Great: 309%
SSK Storage 256GB
42GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 648
Write 748
Mixed 521
143% 639 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 40.6
140% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 29.3
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 0.2
44% 98.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 25.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 29.3
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 60 31.5" 1707 889 ELE0001 EM3FPAC32BC
Typical HA-4 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Peladn HA-4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback