Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	326% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	18.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210713
Uptime	7.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '24 at 19:22
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Memory 69.2 1-Core 135 2-Core 248 82% 151 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 817 80% 657 Pts	64-Core 988 61% 988 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.7% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 111 Parallax 177 93% 134 fps	MRender 93.4 Gravity 133 Splatting 76.6 81% 101 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 678GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1445 1328 1353 1377 1378 1357 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	326% Outstanding	Read 2,620 Write 2,496 Mixed 1,866 SusWrite 1,373 468% 2,089 MB/s	4K Read 63.6 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 74.5 277% 99.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1318 DQ Write 1,040 DQ Mixed 1,171 879% 1,176 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 326% Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 405GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 451 453 453 453 450 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 446 Mixed 384 SusWrite 451 100% 443 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 86.5 4K Mixed 54.7 180% 61.1 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 199 149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 134%
Corsair Performance Pro 128GB 268 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 119GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 306 309 309 309 305 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	69% Good	Read 416 Write 304 Mixed 244 SusWrite 307 71% 318 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 23 81% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 134 117% 174 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 92%
Corsair Performance Pro 128GB 268 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 119GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 304 304 305 307 307 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 399 Write 294 Mixed 246 SusWrite 304 70% 311 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 23.6 82% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 133 116% 174 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 173 184 180 182 168 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Read 131 Write 168 Mixed 71.4 SusWrite 178 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 49GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 102 102 101 102 101 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Read 206 Write 162 Mixed 86.4 SusWrite 100 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 157 156 140 136 135 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 151 Write 150 Mixed 67.8 SusWrite 146 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 34% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$60 86,372 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.2% Good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 25.3 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 24.1 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	165	31.5"	1280 720	GSM775C LG ULTRAGEAR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $189Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,338x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $245Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,059x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	883x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	510x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	401x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $479Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	361x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	438x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	385x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	207x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	159x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	125x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	117x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,194

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16