Jginyue X99-8D4/2.5G Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemJginyue X99-8D4/2.5G Server  (all builds)
MotherboardJGINYUE X99-8D4/2.5G Server
Memory121.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '24 at 17:39
Run Duration491 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 52.8
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 187
53% 101 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 444
49% 388 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Nvidia(10DE 2484) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 190
Parallax 170
133% 174 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 137
Splatting 129
123% 154 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 124%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful CN600 512GB DDR
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFO13.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1915 1856 1862 1155 774 776 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,137
Write 1,894
Mixed 1,338
SusWrite 1,390
327% 1,440 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 40.3
128% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 648
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 501
363% 479 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 191%
Great: 301%
Colorful CN600 512GB DDR
152GB free
Firmware: ECFO13.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1846 1865 1882 1325 765 773 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,044
Write 1,879
Mixed 1229
SusWrite 1,409
316% 1,390 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 42.8
139% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 637
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 535
384% 501 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 193%
Great: 301%
HP EX950 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 42BFU6MG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1557 1602 1626 1623 1627 1637 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,165
Write 1,536
Mixed 1,500
SusWrite 1,612
382% 1,704 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 47.5
152% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 659
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 532
389% 516 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 255%
Great: 407%
HP EX950 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 42BFU6MG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1598 1623 1651 1648 1650 1647 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1473
Write 1,651
Mixed 1,507
SusWrite 1636
354% 1,567 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 48.1
153% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 658
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 539
393% 520 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 229%
Great: 407%
HP EX950 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 42BFU6MG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1524 1511 1555 1580 1621 1628 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,382
Write 1556
Mixed 1,486
SusWrite 1,570
339% 1,498 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 48
152% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 654
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 536
390% 516 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 221%
Great: 407%
HP EX950 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 42BFU6MG
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,463
Write 1,551
Mixed 1,480
335% 1,498 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 47.3
151% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 653
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 532
388% 513 MB/s
Poor: 202% Great: 407%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB1-CRC M393A4K40BB1-CRC M393A4K40CB1-CRC M393A4K40CB1-CRC 127GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
134% Outstanding
MC Read 64.4
MC Write 48.5
MC Mixed 51.8
157% 54.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 134%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 IPS2380 HDMI
Typical X99-8D4/2.5G Server Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

System: Jginyue X99-8D4/2.5G Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback