GPD G1619-04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 206%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics234% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGPD G1619-04  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1619-04
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '24 at 07:23
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 60.7
1-Core 167
2-Core 332
96% 187 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 974
102% 819 Pts
64-Core 1,315
81% 1,315 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
234% Outstanding
Lighting 311
Reflection 498
Parallax 405
253% 405 fps
MRender 502
Gravity 360
Splatting 258
292% 373 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 234%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,958
Write 4,542
Mixed 3,262
808% 3,588 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 94.6
312% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,398
DQ Write 1,148
DQ Mixed 1,285
959% 1,277 MB/s
Poor: 299% Great: 592%
Wd_black SN770M 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 731100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3662 3616 3574 3430 3619 3634 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
549% Outstanding
Read 4,144
Write 3,697
Mixed 2,709
SusWrite 3,589
794% 3,535 MB/s
4K Read 64.3
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 84.4
308% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1690
DQ Write 1435
DQ Mixed 1,548
1,164% 1,558 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 549%
Great: 549%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66BK7BX067 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
154% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 69.6
MC Mixed 49.6
161% 56.3 GB/s
SC Read 40
SC Write 62
SC Mixed 50.6
145% 50.9 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 154%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 1R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 15% 33 216 57 144 37.5" 1280 720 DELA17F Dell AW3821DW
Typical G1619-04 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: GPD G1619-04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 247% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback