Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231109
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateMar 07 '24 at 20:41
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700F-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 74
1-Core 189
2-Core 379
110% 214 Pts
4-Core 750
8-Core 1,394
128% 1,072 Pts
64-Core 2168
134% 2168 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 107%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 285
Reflection 243
Parallax 285
232% 271 fps
MRender 303
Gravity 227
Splatting 165
182% 232 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 192%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$125
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 558 498 225 263 239 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 902
Write 548
Mixed 646
SusWrite 332
135% 607 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 57.5
214% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 501
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 466
365% 500 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 145%
Great: 144%
Ssstc CL1-4D256-D22 256GB
39GB free
Firmware: 2S222
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,394
Write 1,138
Mixed 969
259% 1,167 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 29.9
196% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 691
DQ Write 809
DQ Mixed 447
421% 649 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 149%
Adata SP600NS34 128GB
10GB free
Firmware: 5.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 165 165 165 166 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 423
Write 161
Mixed 202
SusWrite 166
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 38.4
137% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 119
116% 187 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
90GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 117 116 116 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 85.5
Write 89.7
Mixed 61.1
SusWrite 116
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
139GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 121 121 122 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 118
Write 120
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 121
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 108%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$54
1GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 107
Write 92.4
Mixed 76
69% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 24.6
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22.1
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 12 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4 Builds (Compare 4,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $1,015
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback