Casper NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER LGFA 001
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '24 at 18:20
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 214
68% 127 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 404
44% 347 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Quanta(152D 1317) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 19.2
15% 17.9 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 15.4
13% 16 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR045 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 804
Write 895
Mixed 897
194% 865 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 33.7
118% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 655
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 460
335% 448 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FRS 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
37.2% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 1R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 8% 65 91 56 60 27" 1280 720 SAM71DB LS27AG32x
Typical NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NB S500 SILVER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback