Asrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '24 at 06:40
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$176
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 63.1
1-Core 179
2-Core 354
102% 199 Pts
4-Core 683
8-Core 1,277
117% 980 Pts
64-Core 1,548
96% 1,548 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Gigabyte(1458 2413) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 187
Parallax 408
123% 249 fps
MRender 212
Gravity 261
Splatting 237
194% 236 fps
Poor: 178%
This bench: 138%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$155
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1516 1635 1535 1750 1836 1819 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,794
Write 2,146
Mixed 1824
SusWrite 1,682
421% 1,861 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 43.1
141% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 541
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 474
346% 456 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 238%
Great: 587%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
322GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 193 186 197 206 203 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 328
Write 214
Mixed 268
SusWrite 195
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 26.6
87% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 92.4
DQ Mixed 95.4
74% 102 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLM16G40C18U4B.M8FB1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4066 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.2% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 17.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 42 144 31.5" 1280 720 MSI3DC5 MSI G321CU
Typical X570 Taichi Razer Edition Builds (Compare 304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 191%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 210%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback