Asrock H610M-HDV/M.2+ D5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAsrock H610M-HDV/M.2+ D5  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock H610M-HDV/M.2+ D5
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '24 at 05:37
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 76.1
1-Core 168
2-Core 340
102% 195 Pts
4-Core 631
8-Core 823
93% 727 Pts
64-Core 825
51% 825 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$301
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12027.9001
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.2% Outstanding
Lighting 103
Reflection 130
Parallax 194
84% 142 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 106
Splatting 162
126% 154 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful CN600 256GB PRO
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H230715a
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,777
Write 1,852
Mixed 901
336% 1,510 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 84
271% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,422
DQ Write 969
DQ Mixed 614
616% 1002 MB/s
Poor: 151% Great: 261%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
364GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 107
Write 92.7
Mixed 44
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G48C40U5.M4A1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 25.8
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 22.6
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 23.8" 1280 720 MDA0238 N2455 Pro
Typical H610M-HDV/M.2+ D5 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO

System: Asrock H610M-HDV/M.2+ D5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback